Certainly, the establishment of a collective fund, contributed to by every Grand Lodge, dedicated to retaining legal support for filing DCMA Takedown Notices, is a prudent initiative. As Masons, we pledge to defend each other's character, and this approach allows us to do so on a broader scale.
Certainly, the establishment of a collective fund, contributed to by every Grand Lodge, dedicated to retaining legal support for filing DCMA Takedown Notices, is a prudent initiative. As Masons, we pledge to defend each other's character, and this approach allows us to do so on a broader scale.
Freemasons devised a form of multifactor authentication centuries ago, with penalties serving as effective deterrents against breach. This commitment is still evident in our physical protection of privacy at Lodge meetings and against the approach of impersonators.
In today's digital landscape, the risk of identity abuse and scams is an unfortunate reality. It falls upon each individual Mason, Lodge, and Grand Lodge to uphold our privacy, manage exposure, and address the repercussions of any breaches. The responsibility is inherent, and creating a centralized fund for legal action aligns with our duty to protect the fraternity.
Considering the global presence of Masons, the extensive online footprint of the fraternity, and the abundance of sensitive information under our guardianship, Freemasonry appears to be out-performing other entities in addressing these challenges. In comparison to government
or e-commerce, our proactive stance on privacy and security is commendable.
So why is it so damn difficult to build a regional digital directory of Masons?
Certainly, the establishment of a collective fund, contributed to by every Grand Lodge, dedicated to retaining legal support for filing DCMA Takedown Notices, is a prudent initiative. As Masons, we pledge to defend each other's character, and this approach allows us to do so on a broader scale.
Freemasons devised a form of multifactor authentication centuries ago, with penalties serving as effective deterrents against breach. This commitment is still evident in our physical protection of privacy at Lodge meetings and against the approach of impersonators.
In today's digital landscape, the risk of identity abuse and scams is an unfortunate reality. It falls upon each individual Mason, Lodge, and Grand Lodge to uphold our privacy, manage exposure, and address the repercussions of any breaches. The responsibility is inherent, and creating a centralized fund for legal action aligns with our duty to protect the fraternity.
Considering the global presence of Masons, the extensive online footprint of the fraternity, and the abundance of sensitive information under our guardianship, Freemasonry appears to be out-performing other entities in addressing these challenges. In comparison to government
or e-commerce, our proactive stance on privacy and security is commendable.
So why is it so damn difficult to build a regional digital directory of Masons?
That directory would sure be handy! But I think it would have to be a localized initiative, at least to get the ball rolling.