Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brother Rob's avatar

Good piece. We love the stuff and the clutter dont we, so we stop seeing it the way a bride or an event planner would.

I often wonder if the reason most of us never convert our spaces into event centers is that our heart isn't in it. It feels like a business, or a job, or something we're only doing to survive. I used to see the wedding venue as the obvious play too. Then a conversation with a local 4-H leader changed my mind. She told me her clubs were struggling to find places to meet for classes, and when they did find a spot, the place wanted market rate. So we fixed that. We host 4-H summer camp now, and we've got a Girl Scout sleepover coming up to help a visiting troop save on hotel money.

That got me thinking about the building as a community hub instead of a banquet hall. If we sent a hundred letters to every club and public group in town offering them space, our building starts to become their building too.

There's a practical side to it. A lot of our temples qualify as historic places, which opens up grants and exemptions we leave on the table. Our own board reincorporated as a 501(c)(3), and as a public charity instead of just a title holder, we can run programs, apply for grants, and offer space to other nonprofits. We serve a public good, and in our state that earns the property tax exemption. The community hub is where the charity status and the grants finally make sense, in a way that chasing weddings never quite did for most of us.

None of which kills the event center idea, if a lodge truly wants it. Two things just have to be honest about it. One is capital. A private buyer walks in ready to invest, while a lodge is usually keeping the lights on with nothing left for marketing. The other is skin in the game. When the place runs as a business, somebody's livelihood depends on filling that calendar, and a volunteer committee that meets once a month can't match that. So if nobody's paid to care, pay somebody. Lease the space to an operator at a flat rate and let them keep the upside. Tie a manager's pay to bookings. One temple in my district sold their building to a brother and his wife, but part of the deal was a 30-year lease back to the Masons at a fair price. The brothers kept their home, somebody with skin in the game runs the place, and it actually gets used.

The Scuttlebutt's avatar

Yes, and: Those buildings now making money that were not doing so under faternal management have a couple other things that they didn't used to.

1) The capital needed to fix up the building's problems. Every Lodge I've been in has had maintenence issues outstanding. Things that NEED fixed. A bussiness man can take out a loan to fix the building, we can't or won't.

2) Professional management. That means an advertising budget, a manager available during bussiness hours that can talk to you and sign a contract, usually an event coordinator who can assist with decoration and design... and all the other trappings of a bussiness. Does your lodge (and I speek to all Masons reading this) have an advertising budget? Does it have someone who is readily available during bussiness hours that can sign the contract? Or is it a brother who is at work, and can meet up with you some time after work, then we can go to the temple board and ask permission....

3) No arduous rules. No "you can't have beer, wine, or alcohol on site, because a group of tee-totalers is offended by the idea of alcohol, so they made a rule that either you can't have booze at all, or you must have a professional licenced bartender to have it.

In short, they are, and run like a bussiness who is in the bussiness of making a proffit. Suprise, suprise, they do so.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?