Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerry O'Brien's avatar

I think a balance needs to considered.

First, do we have a duty? Is it imposed by society, ourselves, some other factor? Regardless, if the duty exists, and we feel compelled to speak, then let us take heed to that Staircase Lecture and educate ourselves.

When I first started working at Microsoft, way back in 2005, it was an initial shock in regards to the dynamics of the team I was on, and the culture at the company. I had never worked for a company that large before. Most of my jobs were at companies where I interacted with no more than 20 people in the entire company, or at the least, the local office.

Six months into the job, we are sitting in a team meeting and a topic was being discussed. The subject escapes me presently, but it was technically related. The manager had heard from most of the members of the team. She looked over at me and asked why I hadn't spoken. I replied that I agreed with everything that had been stated and did not feel the need to just add my voice of confirmation.

She also made the comment that I don't always speak up in meetings and was concerned that I might be feeling shy or some other factor was influencing it.

Before I could answer, a fellow team member spoke up. He said, "Gerry might not always speak up in meetings, but when he does, you had better listen because his input is well thought out, appropriate, and usually has taken into consideration, all the information. He makes informed decisions."

So that is my point. Educate yourself on the topic before weighing in. Understand all sides of the argument, if there is an argument, and take that understanding into consideration before speaking.

Too many people react quickly, just to be heard. Too many people in society today, and especially in social media, have the "look at me" mentality. A case in point. I posted on a FB group the other day about the Meta AI announcement stating that the DJI Neo 2 drone was a great tool for real estate imaging tasks but the people in the U.S. had to wait, because it wasn't available. Well, I own one. Purchased from Amazon two week prior to that announcement by Meta. I made mention of that and one member of the group immediately replied with the comment, "AI sucks!". My response was, "Depends on the AI" to which he replied, "Let me clarify, 100% of AI sucks."

Was there any useful information in his post? Not an ounce of usefulness. Was it educated? In my opinion, not even a little.

So, in summary, if we find duty compels us to speak, for the food of society, Masonry, <add your favorite topic here>, then let's please start with educating ourselves on the topic first.

By the way, I have had a personal motto for many years.

"Education is a light load to carry. You can never have too much. Learn something new everyday."

Bob Brockman's avatar

I believe we are called to speak of injustices whenever we can. To encourage free and open dialogue. I’m not sure why a person would need to be economically secure in order to exercise their freedom of speech. It seems to me that what is being said is that if you’re not economically secure then you need to sit and be quiet, that what you have to say has no value. The one thing that needs to be said about freedom of speech is that you can say what you want, but there may be consequences to what you say.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?